How many five year olds could you take in a fight?

**Tails** · 08-14-2008, 10:40 PM

http://www.howmanyfiveyearoldscouldyoutakeinafight.com

Let see what you can do. :P

**rambo** · 08-14-2008, 10:44 PM

i could take 22

**ZedIsDead** · 08-14-2008, 10:50 PM

I could only take 10, but that's because I'm a fairly small guy who actually has morals.

**Kugyince** · 08-14-2008, 11:01 PM

I can take 30.

I'm a big guy and I fight dirty.

**Tails** · 08-14-2008, 11:03 PM

14 for me, same lines as Chris.

**mj23** · 08-14-2008, 11:11 PM

**oasis** · 08-14-2008, 11:46 PM

same as tenser. 30

if these kids were pissed at me I would be whooping some ass

**count100** · 08-15-2008, 12:48 AM

i got the same as oasis and tenser 30 kids, so bring 'em on ;D

**Kugyince** · 08-15-2008, 01:26 AM

Oasis, Count and I are good for a kindergarten class each. Lets go bust up that daycare next!

**tanc24** · 08-15-2008, 02:17 AM

It says I could take 28 but, I'm pretty sure I could take out an entire ARMY.

I mean seriously, if those little maggots were trying to kill me without any weapons, you could bring 1,000 at me and I'd take 'em.

**Dudebro** · 08-15-2008, 02:35 AM

34.
I fully support this quiz, It involves pile driving children.

**Kugyince** · 08-15-2008, 02:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tanc24

It says I could take 28 but, I'm pretty sure I could take out an entire ARMY.

I mean seriously, if those little maggots were trying to kill me without any weapons, you could bring 1,000 at me and I'd take 'em.

I see you've thought this through.

**Dudebro** · 08-15-2008, 02:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tenser

Quote:

Originally Posted by tanc24

It says I could take 28 but, I'm pretty sure I could take out an entire ARMY.

I mean seriously, if those little maggots were trying to kill me without any weapons, you could bring 1,000 at me and I'd take 'em.

I see you've thought this through.

You haven't?

**Kugyince** · 08-15-2008, 02:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dudebro

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tenser

Quote:

Originally Posted by tanc24

It says I could take 28 but, I'm pretty sure I could take out an entire ARMY.

I mean seriously, if those little maggots were trying to kill me without any weapons, you could bring 1,000 at me and I'd take 'em.

I see you've thought this through.

You haven't?

Yes, but with undead seven year-olds.

**tanc24** · 08-15-2008, 03:03 AM

I'd say I'm ready for fatherhood.

**Kugyince** · 08-15-2008, 03:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tanc24

I'd say I'm ready for fatherhood.

Why? Have you recently decided your life-long dreams and goals are of no longer a concern?

**Timber Wolf** · 08-15-2008, 09:51 AM

lol nice one Tenser,
uh say's i coud take 23(i think, took it last night, and right now im tired, but it'll come to me evcentually)
but this is hypothetical, if they did something to piss me off enough to start beating the crap out of em, a few might end up dead, and a lot more than 23 kids in the hospital,lol but im a fairly nice person, and to piss me off that much, takes A LOT

**tanc24** · 08-15-2008, 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tenser

Why? Have you recently decided your life-long dreams and goals are of no longer a concern?

Ahem, do I see a grammatical mistake?

You're slippin', my brother.

**Kugyince** · 08-15-2008, 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tanc24

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tenser

Why? Have you recently decided your life-long dreams and goals are of no longer a concern?

Ahem, do I see a grammatical mistake?

You're slippin', my brother.

No, you don't. Sorry, please try again.

[br]Posted on: August 15, 2008, 02:16:19 PM_________________________________________________

Quote:

Originally Posted by tanc24

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tenser

Why? Have you recently decided your life-long dreams and goals are of no longer a concern?

Ahem, do I see a grammatical mistake?

You're slippin', my brother.

Let me correct that. If you are referring to the bolded section you are incorrect. I do however see a mistake that is quite obscure. I noticed it before I even posted said comment but I assumed it is so minute that no one here would catch it anyways. Plus rep if you did.

**tanc24** · 08-15-2008, 04:20 PM

Yes, I was referring to the bolded section. It doesn't read right, in my opinion.

As for the obscure mistake, I can only guess that life-long is really supposed to be spelled "lifelong".
Everything else looks a-ok to me.

**Kugyince** · 08-15-2008, 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tanc24

Yes, I was referring to the bolded section. It doesn't read right, in my opinion.

As for the obscure mistake, I can only guess that life-long is really supposed to be spelled "lifelong".
Everything else looks a-ok to me.

You're close.

**count100** · 08-16-2008, 12:44 AM

tenser, it wouldn't happen to be the fact that you have it written as dreams and goals instead of life-long dream and goals?

08-16-2008, 01:21 AM

It said I could take 32. This quiz reminded me of the fight scene from "Step-brothers".

**Kugyince** · 08-16-2008, 01:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tenser

Why? Have you recently decided your life-long dreams and goals are of no longer a concern?

The structure of the second sentence is not proper English. The sentence is structured and punctuated as a question yet it lacks one of the six "question words." Again, this is an extremely obscure rule and modern vernacular has made it acceptable. I do not follow this rule nor would I call anyone else out on this either. Any on the following examples would have worked;

Why, have you recently decided your life-long dreams and goals are of no longer a concern?
You must have recently decided your life-long dreams and goals are of no longer a concern.
When did you decide your life-long dreams and goals are of no longer a concern?

**count100** · 08-16-2008, 01:49 AM

and here i thought that it was a easy answer ;Dlol..