Quote:
|
Personally I side with people who have watched the skies since before recorded {modern} history.
|
Why? They're just people staring up at the sky. They have little or no access to higher education or modern tools to measure and examine the problem. Elders saying the sky looks different isn't very helpful because of a few factors-
-eyewitnesses are notoriously unreliable
-they only have their limited anecdotal evidence to back their claim up
-the massive scope of climate change is not something you can measure by looking at the sky in one part of the world for a few decades.
-they have no real access to the tools that could actually help them understand these changes.
Quote:
|
I'm not saying the Scientists are completely full of shit, but they go back and forth
|
You may not be saying it but that's what you're implying by siding with the elders over countless scientists who dedicate their lives to studying this and have access to cutting edge technology.
Also science is never set in stone, theories change as new evidence is presented or old evidence is debunked or reexamined. Science is all about trying to disprove theories not the other way around. If some scientists got paid off to lie they'd be exposed because there'd be tons of other scientists testing their findings looking for holes. That's why science is reliable and the best way to see the natural world.