[TodayIsForgotten]

I am truly confused on how some of these nominations work or what people's grading criteria are.

If someone's body of work is games in the past in a specific decade but show only a few brush strokes, how are they being nominated vs someone else who has a resume building?

If Billy Mitchell joins the site and puts up a monster pacman score and thats it, i guarantee people start nominating him for best new comer.

Best newcomer should be the person who did the most damage. Not someone who puts up 2 big scores.

To me, best new comer is rookie of the year. You don't judge a pitcher by his 2 blow out wins you judge it by his WHIP, K's, ERA, Strikeouts, etc. His whole body of work.

If RU needs to add more categories then do so but don't justify it because of your own criteria.