Quote:
Originally Posted by jim5cents
Obviously not, as both Cassidy and I disagree.
It is the consistancy of rulings that gets me. This site has take a fairly hard stance on following the rules, specifically on the grounds of cheating. I'm not saying that anyone cheated in this case, but there was a rule very specifically about how team captains had to submit players, but since it appears that the rule would penalize someone or a team in particular, there was an idea to bend the rules.
Earlier in this tournament, there was a player who would not be able to play, the rules were very specific that this player would be eliminated and even though the circumstances were drastic, the ruling was made to follow the letter of the rule.
So, why is there no consistancy in these rulings?
|
You've been out-voted, Jim. 3 teams to 1. Also, what does it matter? I named Seahawk as our participant for this round last night. His current score was submitted after I named him the participant. No harm, no foul.
The only way this would've become an issue is is Kong/Tenser had've rolled a 1 last night before I posted.
If you think about it, there was perfect consistency in both cases. In the Dojah injury case, we had a vote. You guys lost out. In this "team captains must post" case, we had a vote. You guys lost out again. In every instance where we've had a dispute, we take a vote. Majority wins.