Quote:
Mmmm, that doesn't sound very good, does it?
Is it possible that she was talking about criminals with guns, that is, illegal unlicensed firearms?
|
No she meant anyone. Yes it was directly influenced by the Columbine massacre and she was just being a typical moron spouting her emotional response instead of really considering the issue(like she did when it directly effected her).
Quote:
|
You're using that prejudice again, and pre - judging what people say based on your own pre - conceived notions about them.
|
Again I see it differently. I see it as being cautious and not just believing her rants because they line up with my beliefs. She has proven to be unreliable in the past, why give her automatic trust on this issue?
Dan Rather is not an expert on explosions or implosions. His opinion on what happened is completely irrelevant. These people have to keep talking and putting ideas out there to keep viewers interested. You always talk about how we can't trust the corporate media machine, why start now?
Btw we're way off topic now and this is becoming a conspiracy discussion. Honestly I think it's the best thing to happen to this boring topic but we should wrap it up and make room for all the "rip" posts that are so much more important, right?
